🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage could be the optimal pick for a bold scary movie about the biblical figure, but not for the causes some audiences could guess. In reality, the star doesn't actually act as the central religious figure in The Carpenter’s Son: the part he plays is credited only as a craftsman. Cage is framed as a father figure in this story, working to uphold his faith as The Boy (acted by Noah Jupe), his adolescent adopted son, begins to exhibit supernatural abilities. The reason it's challenging to picture another prominent performer playing this part is that while the figure grows stricken with numerous trials, Nicolas Cage appears nearly touchingly confident that the dark, grim little movie is a valuable project.

The Actor's Current Career Choices

Cage has been using his time more judiciously lately. He continues to stars in more movies than most casual fans could possibly view — for instance, did you know that he has completed three separate frontier films over the last few years? — yet he also includes high-profile independent films such as one recent hit, Pig, and a further title. The Carpenter’s Son appears to be in that category, as it’s not strictly scary, potentially provocative, and approaches a exaggerated premise in a earnest manner.

Movie's Storyline and Execution

Sadly, writer-director Lotfy Nathan does not reward the audience's focus. The Carpenter’s Son opens in a engagingly rootless place, presented as based on an unknown scripture about Christ’s childhood. Cage's character, The Mother, and the boy move frequently, fearful of faith-based hostility or suspicion over The Boy’s mysterious gifts. “Calamity follows us,” Cage sadly observes. This persists as evil influences target the family in their latest settlement, initiating with that traditional religious challenge for the son.

Sometimes, the film resembles an demonic possession-type horror film, though not one of the main figures are directly possessed. Instead, they become increasingly alienated from one another, as these forces influence a resident female (the actress, credited as an outsider) that The Boy forms a relationship with, and presents all unsettling premonitions of a bleak destiny. The Carpenter in particular grapples with his position in this story, at times scolding his child who mystifies him.

Debate and Caution

The subject matter is likely to stir disagreement, and Nathan treats it with much sensitivity — too much, perhaps. The concept of a adolescent confronted with his destined offering and seduced by dark influences is certainly frightening, but Nathan may be wary of appearing sensational and eager to telegraph his goals, therefore he regularly withdraws to gloomily threatening visuals. The figures brood incessantly — the singer-actress, who displayed genuine potential in a recent film update, of all things — surrenders her role to her character's costume, sometimes broken up by a few gruesome scary visuals.

The Star's Performance and Film's Flaws

Simultaneously, the actor flirts with precisely the type of overacting that his more snickering appreciators could be expecting. An instance (shown) in promotional material in which Cage erupts and yells “I’ve lost my faith!” If that kind of dramatic explosion is a component of your religious scary film, maybe a more brazenly silly style would make better use of Cage’s willingness to go over the top when necessary. Instead, The Carpenter’s Son is closer to the less successful direct-to-video productions he starred in during the 2010s — apart from the B-movies but rather the serious stories and supernatural thrillers that typically appear interesting, and usually have several notable memorable scenes, but in the end seem like, well, low-budget DTV material.

Honestly, several of these, though not as grand, were easier to view in general. This is when I need to violate my usual practice, not religious but professional: Previously, a beloved editor urged me to remove descriptive terms like “boring” or “dull” from my film-criticism vocabulary. Such terms convey little except a individual and vaguely expressed restlessness, disengaging from the task of vibrantly communicating the intellectual and feeling of seeing a specific film. It's hard to express tedium without seeming uninteresting oneself. It’s no more expressive as calling a movie “notable.” “Say more,” essentially.

Yet, I acknowledge, I was bored for a large part of the film. In its defense, it is a religious style of stultification, not due to The Carpenter’s Son is preachy, but because it demands a kind of dutiful submission to watch it. Eventually soon after starting, this feature settles into a monotonous pattern of ongoing suffering, and fails to